TRUMP(特朗普币)芝麻开门交易所

Is Bitcoin mining a waste of resources Analyzing Bitcoin Mining

Date:2024-04-09 18:05:10 Channel:Build Read:
In today's digital age, Bitcoin has become a hot digital asset, and the mining process of Bitcoin has always been controversial. Some people think that Bitcoin mining is a waste of resources. Is this true? This article will start with the principles of Bitcoin mining and explore this topic in depth.
The mining principle of Bitcoin is mainly based on blockchain technology. Blockchain is a decentralized distributed ledger technology, and the Bitcoin network is built based on blockchain technology. Bitcoin mining is the process of using computing power to solve mathematical puzzles, verify transactions, and record them on the blockchain. Miners solve mathematical puzzles to create new blocks and are rewarded with a certain number of Bitcoins. This process is called "mining," and the electricity and computing resources consumed by mining have led to controversy over resource waste.

The four most famous international exchanges:

Binance INTL
OKX INTL
Gate.io INTL
Huobi INTL
Binance International Line OKX International Line Gate.io International Line Huobi International Line
China Line APP DL China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL

Note: The above exchange logo is the official website registration link, and the text is the APP download link.

First, let’s take a closer look at how Bitcoin mining works. Every transaction in the Bitcoin network is packaged into a "block" and then connected into a chain, known as a blockchain, through a cryptographic hash function. In order to ensure the security and non-tamperability of transactions, the Bitcoin network sets a difficult problem, which is to find a specific hash value such that the hash value of this block is less than a target value. This process requires a lot of computing power, so miners need to constantly try different random numbers to find a qualified hash value. This process is the so-called "proof of work" mechanism, namely Proof of Work, or PoW for short.
In the Bitcoin network, a new block is generated every ten minutes, and the mining process is to constantly try to find a hash value that meets the conditions until a miner finds the hash value. This miner has obtained the accounting rights, can add the block to the blockchain, and obtain a certain amount of Bitcoin rewards, as well as transaction fees. This process not only ensures the security and decentralization of the Bitcoin network, but also guarantees the validity and traceability of transactions.
However, it is precisely because Bitcoin mining requires a large amount of computing power and electricity consumption that it has triggered the "waste of resources" controversy. According to statistics, the Bitcoin network consumes as much electricity annually as the total electricity consumption of some small countries, which has led some to question the environmental impact and resource utilization efficiency of Bitcoin mining. Especially in the context of increasingly serious global greenhouse gas emissions, the energy consumption of Bitcoin mining has become a topic of great concern.
However, there are also those who believe that Bitcoin mining is not entirely a waste of resources. First of all, the decentralized nature of the Bitcoin network gives anyone the opportunity to participate in mining, which reduces the possibility of monopoly and ensures the security and fairness of the network. Secondly, the energy consumption of the Bitcoin network is also driving innovation in the energy industry and promoting the development and utilization of renewable energy. Some miners have begun building mining facilities near renewable energy power plants to reduce reliance on traditional energy sources.
In general, although Bitcoin mining consumes a lot of resources, the blockchain technology behind it provides a solid foundation for the development of digital currencies. In the future, with the advancement of technology and the improvement of social awareness, I believe that Bitcoin mining will become more efficient and environmentally friendly. We need to find a balance between resource utilization and environmental protection to promote the sustainable development of Bitcoin and its derivative technologies.

Is Bitcoin mining a waste of resources? Regarding this question, there is no doubt that the answer is definitely polarized. Bitcoin opponents accuse mining of using up a lot of resources to do meaningless coin tossing, while supporters give the example of gold mining. A lot of resources are wasted doing meaningless digging.

Supporters believe that Bitcoin mining is a huge waste of social resources, not just electricity. There are also manpower, human energy, intelligence, talents, so many high-specification graphics cards and the resources consumed in manufacturing these graphics cards. They could have been used in more useful places for society, but now they are wasted here on something as purely useless as Bitcoin. On useless counterfeit currency. The way to obtain Bitcoin is a crime against human society.

Opponents believe that considering the significance of mining and coinage, the energy consumed by mining is not considered a waste.

First of all, the electricity currently consumed by mining accounts for only 1% of China's electricity production, which is less than half of the electricity consumed by data centers across the country.

The purpose of mining is not to waste energy, but to make the coinage industry break away from power and become a real industrial category. It is to consume half of the total human ability, so that humans have the ability to operate society with only half of their ability. The upper limit of the scale of mining and coinage is the sum of the scale of all other industries, so it is not a waste of resources.

The author believes that Bitcoin mining is not a waste of resources. Why?

Before that, let’s take a look at some of the wasteful behaviors that are considered by the public:

1. When driving to a certain place, instead of taking the shortest route, you took a long detour. The symbolic significance of waste in this example is a failure in the management and allocation of resources.

2. When I went to the canteen to get food, I obviously only had two taels of food, but I ordered three taels of rice. If anyone says this is not a waste, please go out and turn right, we can't communicate.

3. Faucets, lights, and heaters are turned on, and some cities even light up some roads with little traffic at night for the sake of dignity. The symbolic meaning of waste in this example is that when an activity itself is meaningless, performing this activity is a waste. Excluding venting emotions or other special circumstances, the act of turning on the tap without turning it off will not produce any value, so it is undoubtedly a waste.

4. No one would think that it was a waste to use incandescent bulbs for household lighting during Edison's time, but many people think that it is a waste to still use incandescent bulbs for household lighting now. The significance of this example to represent waste is that to determine whether an activity is wasteful, one needs to consider the limitations of technical capabilities. Until stronger and more efficient technologies (such as cold light lamps) appear, it cannot be said that old technologies (such as incandescent lamps) are wasteful.

Let’s go back to Bitcoin mining.

1. First of all, is the behavior of Bitcoin mining meaningful? I am afraid this is the key point of dispute between the pros and cons.

People who have a negative attitude towards Bitcoin mining believe that Bitcoin has no actual value, so it is a waste; those who support it believe that Bitcoin has actual value, so it is not a waste.

We can imagine: a password string composed of letters and numbers has no value in itself, but if a certain bank appears and maps this alphanumeric password string to an item in a drawer in a certain warehouse of the bank, then , this password string has value.

Bitcoin can be understood as an alphanumeric password string. However, no bank currently uses Bitcoin to correspond to items in a certain drawer of a certain warehouse, and no government clearly stipulates the applicable scenarios of Bitcoin. Private Bitcoin transactions are more like trading some kind of impossible transaction. Artwork to be admired. So I think the actual value of Bitcoin at this stage is questionable, but this does not mean that Bitcoin will have no value in the future.

Bitcoin mining can basically be compared to investing in treasury bonds or pre-purchasing iPhoneX. It is a trade of the present for the future. There is only a difference in risk, but no essential difference. Therefore, Bitcoin mining should be a meaningful and reasonable behavior.

2. Considering the existing technical capabilities, does Bitcoin mining consume more resources than the amount of resources required to complete it? It seems not. But if you are still using a graphics card to mine, it is suspected of being a waste;

3. Are there any errors in the management and allocation of resources in Bitcoin mining?

Regarding this issue, as a person who has never mined, I cannot determine whether there is a mistake. However, even assuming that there are errors in resource management and allocation in Bitcoin mining, it can be corrected without affecting the core content of this topic.

But a new question also arises here, that is, from the overall perspective of human social activities, is investing resources in Bitcoin mining itself a mismanagement and allocation of resources?

This reminds me of the fact that some civilian companies are still building airplanes and submarines, but the author believes that one thing that is different from civilian science and technology building aircraft is that the blockchain technology is still generally considered a new technology in the scientific and technological circles. , so Bitcoin mining has certain scientific research and exploration attributes. As for scientific research and exploration, as long as it follows certain scientific principles and methods, it obviously cannot be called waste.

I'll answer.

2512

Ask

964K+

reading

0

Answer

3H+

Upvote

2H+

Downvote