In today's digital world, information moves at an often overwhelming pace. And when it comes to Ponzi schemes and environmental issues, the effect of this rapid spread is even more obvious. Recently, Mozila announced that it would stop collecting cryptocurrency donations, a decision that sparked heated discussions online. Let’s dive into the background and impact of this incident.

From a Ponzi scheme to public criticism of environmental protection, Mozila's decision undoubtedly touched the heartstrings of many followers. Cryptocurrency, as an emerging method of donation, was once considered the future development direction of philanthropy. However, as Ponzi schemes intensified, people's trust in cryptocurrencies gradually declined. Mozila's suspension of collecting cryptocurrency donations is also seen as a response and resistance to Ponzi schemes.

In this era of information explosion, the choice of keywords is crucial. Mozila, cryptocurrency, Ponzi scheme, environmental public opinion, these words are not only the core of the article, but also the key to attracting readers' attention. By cleverly running through these keywords, we can better attract readers' attention and make them interested in the content of the article.

Ponzi scheme, a term that once made people fearful, has now been deeply implanted in people's hearts. Many people are deceived by false promises and end up suffering losses. Mozila's decision is undoubtedly a warning to Ponzi schemes and a wake-up call for the majority of users. In this virtual world, it is crucial to protect your property.

Unlike the Ponzi scheme, environmental public opinion bombardment is another form of challenge. As society pays more and more attention to environmental protection issues, the environmental protection behavior of enterprises has also received more attention. Mozila stops collecting cryptocurrency donations, does this mean they are giving up on environmental causes? This issue has triggered extensive discussion and thinking.

In this era of information overflow, how to stand out among the massive information has become a question that everyone needs to think about. Mozila's decision undoubtedly provides us with a topic worth pondering. Ponzi schemes and environmental issues may seem completely different, but they are intertwined in this incident, presenting a complex picture.

In this era full of challenges and opportunities, we need to be more alert to the traps of Ponzi schemes, and we also need to pay more attention to the importance of environmental issues. Mozila's decision may be just the tip of the iceberg, but it undoubtedly triggers our thinking about social phenomena and our outlook for the future.

To sum up, Mozila’s decision to stop collecting cryptocurrency donations is not just a simple decision, but also a response to Ponzi schemes and environmental issues. In this era of information explosion, we need to be more vigilant and look at the changes happening around us more rationally. May we keep a clear mind in this changing world, protect the safety of our property, and care for this beautiful earth.

The four most famous international exchanges:

Binance INTL	OKX INTL	Gate.io INTL	Huobi INTL
China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL

Note: The above exchange logo is the official website registration link, and the text is the APP download link.

The Mozilla Foundation, a non-profit organization that promotes the open source browser Firefox, announced on Twitter on the 1st that it would accept cryptocurrency donations. It was mercilessly bombarded by the community, and even fished out the original founder to call the move quite shameful; the Mozilla Foundation subsequently Twitter stated today (7th) that it will immediately suspend accepting cryptocurrency donations.

The Mozilla Foundation posted several tweets on Twitter today to express its recent views and suspension of cryptocurrency donations to users who support it and the outside world. The foundation wrote: Last week, we published an article about Mozilla’s acceptance of donations. Tweets about cryptocurrency donations have subsequently led to intense discussions and concerns about environmental impact, and we will take suggestions from the community and take action.

"Decentralized network technology is still an important area for us to explore," the Mozilla Foundation continued, but since we started accepting cryptocurrency donations, a lot of things have changed.

Therefore, Mozilla proposed: From today on, we will review whether the policy of opening cryptocurrency donations is consistent with the goals of climate sustainable development. During this period, we will be suspending the ability to donate cryptocurrencies.

The Mozilla Foundation, which upholds the spirit of open source, finally stated: In the spirit of open source, all this process will be transparent, and we will update and share it regularly. We look forward to discussing this again and thank the community for bringing this issue to our attention.

Accepting Dogecoin as payment, the co-founder choked on it

According to reports, the Mozilla Foundation posted a tweet on Twitter on the 1st to accept cryptocurrency donations and wrote that we are now open to accepting cryptocurrency donations through Bitpay, which subsequently attracted fierce criticism from many technology tycoons.

Among them, this tweet even elicited a response from Mozilla co-founder Jamie Zawinski, saying that everyone involved in this project should feel extremely ashamed to cooperate with the Ponzi schemer who burns and pollutes the earth.

In addition to Zawinski, @plinss, the founder of Gecko, which designed the Firefox running engine, also responded ruthlessly, agreeing 100% with Zawonski's point of view. What is going on? Some supporters of the foundation expressed disappointment and have canceled their follow-up in order to expand the source of donations. , Ruining the credibility established over the years in vain, credibility is not easy to rebuild.

Mozilla quickly issued a statement to stop the bleeding. Although it was based on the goal of climate sustainable development, it inevitably caused damage to its credibility among technology giants and loyal users, as well as public opinion pressure from community leaders.