TRUMP(特朗普币)芝麻开门交易所

SEC Chairman attended the hearing and refused to actively answer

Date:2024-04-06 18:28:16 Channel:Crypto Read:
The SEC chairman recently attended a high-profile hearing but refused to give a clear answer on the hot topic of whether Ethereum is a commodity or a security. This move triggered widespread attention and speculation in the market. In this article, we will delve into the various possible reasons behind the SEC Chairman’s statement, and analyze whether the nature of Ethereum is a commodity or a security from multiple angles.
The SEC Chairman's performance at the hearing triggered heated discussions in the market. He declined to answer questions about Ethereum’s classification, a move seen as a challenge to the cryptocurrency market. This ambiguity has plunged market participants deeper into speculation. Some believe this could be a major adjustment in the SEC’s regulatory policy on cryptocurrency, while others are worried that this uncertainty will bring more volatility to the market.

The four most famous international exchanges:

Binance INTL
OKX INTL
Gate.io INTL
Huobi INTL
Binance International Line OKX International Line Gate.io International Line Huobi International Line
China Line APP DL China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL

Note: The above exchange logo is the official website registration link, and the text is the APP download link.

During the hearing, the SEC Chairman’s words and deeds were full of mystery. He avoided the important issues and avoided the specific classification of Ethereum. This vague statement is reminiscent of the regulatory agencies’ wavering on cryptocurrency regulatory policies. This also reflects the complexity of the cryptocurrency market and the frustration and challenges of regulatory agencies when facing emerging fields.
Judging from historical data and market trends, Ethereum, as a decentralized smart contract platform, has unique functions and uses. However, whether it is classified as a commodity or security has been controversial. According to relevant SEC regulations, securities refer to investment contracts, while commodities are physical or financial products that can be traded. As a digital asset, it is crucial whether its nature meets these two definitions.
In past regulatory practices, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin were deemed commodities, while some initial coin offerings (ICOs) were deemed securities. However, Ethereum’s positioning as a smart contract platform is more complicated. Not only can it be traded as a digital currency, but it can also support the development of various decentralized applications. This dual attribute brings more confusion to Ethereum’s classification.
The SEC Chairman’s statement at the hearing was seen as a signal to the cryptocurrency market. His ambiguity has prompted a reexamination of the nature and regulatory positioning of cryptocurrencies. As one of the most dynamic and innovative projects on the market, Ethereum’s future development will be significantly affected by regulatory policies. Despite constant market volatility, cryptocurrency technology remains strong.

Coin Circle (120btc.COM) News: Gary, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Gensler has recently been controversial due to his tough regulatory attitude towards the cryptocurrency industry and out-of-control remarks. Some members of the U.S. Congress even proposed a proposal to "remove Gensler."

Against this background, Gensler was summoned to Congress yesterday evening (18th), asking him to explain the SEC’s actions in regulating the cryptocurrency industry (the hearing was fully replayed on Youtube.)

 **Gensler declined to answer whether Ethereum is a commodity or a security**

According to relevant reports, at this hearing, Gensler reiterated his regulatory position: he believed that cryptocurrencies belong to the category of securities and should be regulated by current securities laws; but paradoxically, Gensler refused to respond directly when questioned, "Ethereum is Commodities or securities," using a vague phrase: it depends on the legal facts.

In addition, Congressional Chairman Mc Henry also questioned Gensler's behavior and doubted whether the SEC has profited from frequent enforcement actions because the SEC currently has not established enforcement operation regulations for stakeholders.

“It is unreasonable to punish cryptocurrency companies without clarity on how stakeholders should comply with the rules, and this type of regulatory action is unsustainable. … Republican lawmakers also received a letter opposing Gensler ahead of their testimony today. "

 **Genser praises ALGO with the front foot, but blocks it with the back foot**

Just yesterday, the double-faced incident of Genser was discovered. In the past, he was a professor of global economics and management practices at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and he repeatedly praised the technology of the blockchain project Algorand in class.

In a video that went viral on Twitter recently, Genser can be seen calling Algorand an "excellent technology" at the time and thinking about whether a "high-performance" smart contract network can integrate Uber or Algorand on its platform. Apps like Lyft.

But ironically, when Genser became the chairman of the SEC, the agency sued Algorand’s native token ALGO on April 17, charging that the token should be registered as a securities and challenging the Algorand Foundation’s initial issuance of ALGO in June 2019. Coin Offerings (ICOs) were questioned. The reversal of attitude has attracted criticism from the community.

I'll answer.

2512

Ask

964K+

reading

0

Answer

3H+

Upvote

2H+

Downvote