TRUMP(特朗普币)芝麻开门交易所

Judge rules that Satoshi Omoto is not Satoshi Nakamoto nor the a

Date:2024-04-23 18:14:38 Channel:Crypto Read:
In the world of digital currencies, a verdict has sent shockwaves like thunder. The judge ruled that Satoshi Omoto was neither the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto nor the author behind the Bitcoin white paper. This ruling not only revealed a mystery, but also triggered people’s deep thinking about identity and the nature of digital currency. Let's dig deeper behind this incident and explore its details and meaning.
From the judge’s ruling, we saw the revelation of the true identity of Satoshi Oben, which is undoubtedly a major event in the field of digital currency. The mystery of Satoshi Obeng’s identity has troubled countless followers and investors. And when the judge made the ruling, it seemed that the entire digital currency world was shaken. This ruling is undoubtedly a wake-up call to the entire industry and has caused more people to begin to reflect on the nature of digital currency.
In this digital currency world full of variables and unknowns, identity recognition is particularly important. As the judge said, Satoshi Omoto is not Satoshi Nakamoto, let alone the author of the Bitcoin white paper. The logic behind this ruling is far-reaching and worth pondering. The authenticity of identity has become an important threshold in the world of digital currency and the cornerstone of ensuring the security and stable development of the industry.
In this era of information explosion, false identities and anonymity have brought many challenges to the development of digital currencies. The judge’s clear ruling on the identity of Satoshi Oben is undoubtedly a warning to the digital currency industry. The occurrence of this incident made people begin to re-examine the nature of digital currency, and also made more people look forward to the future of the industry.
For Satoshi Oben himself, this ruling is an opportunity to clear his grievances. Mistaken for Satoshi Nakamoto and suspected to be the author of the Bitcoin white paper, the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto's identity has always shrouded him. However, with the judge's ruling, Satoshi Obeng has the opportunity to get rid of the misunderstanding of this identity and restart his digital currency journey.
In this turbulent world of digital currency, the identification of Satoshi Oban is undoubtedly a major event. This ruling not only solved a mystery, but also made people re-examine the importance of digital currency identity. In the future, we look forward to seeing more similar rulings, which will safeguard the development of the digital currency industry and inject more positive energy into the entire industry.
In this era of information explosion, the development prospects of digital currency are exciting. The identity ruling of Satoshi Aoban has sounded the alarm for the development of the industry and pointed out the direction for the future of the industry. Let us look forward to seeing a brighter future for the digital currency industry as it gradually becomes standardized and improved.

The four most famous international exchanges:

Binance INTL
OKX INTL
Gate.io INTL
Huobi INTL
Binance International Line OKX International Line Gate.io International Line Huobi International Line
China Line APP DL China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL
China Line APP DL

Note: The above exchange logo is the official website registration link, and the text is the APP download link.

Coin Circle (120bTC.COM) News: The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) last month filed a lawsuit against Craig, an Australian computer scientist who has long insisted that he is the anonymous founder of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, and is nicknamed "Satoshi Nakamoto" by the community.
Wright filed the lawsuit to prevent him from taking legal action against developers and members of the crypto community or obtaining intellectual property rights to Bitcoin's open source technology.

 British judge: Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto

Just yesterday (14th), British judge James Mellor ruled in the closing argument of the COPA v. Craig Wright case that Craig
Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, nor the author of the Bitcoin white paper: The evidence we received during the month-long trial was overwhelming, and I will make certain statements that I think are useful, and Necessary for justice to be done between the parties. First, Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper; second, he did not adopt the pseudonym "Satoshi Nakamoto" between 2008 and 2011; third, he is not the creator of the Bitcoin system; fourth, he Not the author of the original version of the Bitcoin software.

Including Bitcoin godfather Adam Back and early Bitcoin contributor Martti Malmi, they all objected to Craig Wright’s testimony in court and stated that Craig
Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, providing key evidence for the lawsuit.

Regarding this victory, COPA said: This decision is a victory for developers, the entire open source community, and the truth. For more than eight years, Dr. Wright and his supporters have falsely claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto and used that lie to bully and intimidate developers in the Bitcoin community.

At the same time, Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter (now X), also forwarded the judge’s closing argument on the social platform to express his support.

 Oben Satoshi has repeatedly lost lawsuits

Actually, Craig
Because Wright was unable to produce private key certificates and was caught committing perjury many times, he has frequently lost lawsuits in recent years. In December 2022, he even complained that he was "tired" and said on Twitter that he had given up on letting others I believe he is the "Bitcoin Creator".

For example, in February last year, Satoshi Obeng was defeated in the British High Court. According to the court judgment, the judge ruled that Bitcoin’s file format (a header sequence containing metadata and a transaction list that together constitute a block) “cannot be regarded as a literary work.” ", because Wright was unable to show how the Bitcoin file format was first recorded in writing or otherwise, which is known as the "fixation" test in European and American copyright law.

At the time, Satoshi Omoto argued that he, who wrote the 2008 Bitcoin white paper under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, should have the power to block the operation of blockchains hard forked from the original Bitcoin, including BTC and BCH (Bitcoin Cash). ) blockchain because these Bitcoin forks infringed his intellectual property rights, and he also filed claims against a number of Bitcoin-related defendants, including 26 entities including the Coinbase exchange.

I'll answer.

2512

Ask

964K+

reading

0

Answer

3H+

Upvote

2H+

Downvote