In today's craze for digital currencies, Dogecoin, as a dazzling new star, has attracted the attention of countless investors. However, with the rapid rise of Dogecoin, controversy and accusations surrounding it have also emerged one after another. In particular, the figure of billionaire Elon Musk has always been closely associated with Dogecoin. Recently, the news that he was accused of market manipulation has sparked widespread discussion, and many people have begun to question: What role did Musk play in the rise of Dogecoin? Is he really the culprit of market manipulation?

Before we delve into this issue, we must first understand the origin of Dogecoin. Dogecoin was originally created as a joke cryptocurrency in 2013, and the original design was inspired by the Internet meme of Shiba Inu. However, with Musk's tweets and his support for Dogecoin, Dogecoin has gradually changed from a niche joke coin to a target pursued by investors around the world. Every tweet from Musk can trigger violent fluctuations in the price of Dogecoin, a phenomenon that has led many people to wonder whether he is using his influence to manipulate the market.

Musk's activeness on social media cannot be underestimated. He frequently posts content about Dogecoin, sometimes teasing and sometimes praising it. This method not only attracts the attention of the media, but also attracts the attention of a large number of investors. After seeing Musk's tweets, many people flocked to the market to try to profit from the rise of Dogecoin. This phenomenon caused the price of Dogecoin to soar in a short period of time, and even broke through the $1 mark at one point.

However, as the price of Dogecoin fluctuated sharply, the risks in the market also increased. Investors began to feel uneasy and sought answers. At this time, Musk's influence was pushed to the cusp. Some people began to accuse him of using his fame to manipulate the market and even involve insider trading. After all, Musk's tweets not only affect the decisions of ordinary investors, but may even guide the investment strategies of some large investment institutions.

In this context, many analysts began to analyze Musk's behavior in depth. They pointed out that Musk's speeches on Twitter are often strongly market-oriented, and the timing and content of his speeches are very strategic. For example, when the price of Dogecoin falls, Musk's tweets often trigger a rebound in a short period of time, while when the price rises, he may reduce the market's heat by teasing. This behavior was interpreted by some as a sign of market manipulation, although Musk himself has repeatedly denied the accusation.

At the same time, the relationship between Musk and Dogecoin has also sparked widespread discussion. Many people believe that Musk's support is not only an endorsement of Dogecoin, but also a responsibility. As one of the richest people in the world, Musk's every move may have a profound impact on the market. Should he be held responsible for the price fluctuations of Dogecoin? How should this responsibility be defined? These questions undoubtedly give investors more to think about.

In this context, the debate between supporters and opponents of Dogecoin has intensified. Supporters believe that Musk's support has brought huge exposure to Dogecoin, which in turn has driven its value up. They believe that the rise of Dogecoin is not only a choice of the market, but also a reflection of Musk's personal charm. Opponents believe that Musk's behavior has gone beyond the scope of normal market participants, is an act of market manipulation, and may even constitute legal liability.

It is worth noting that every interaction Musk makes on Twitter may affect the market sentiment of Dogecoin. For example, when he posts a picture of a Shiba Inu on Twitter, the price of Dogecoin tends to rise in response. This phenomenon has attracted the attention of many investors, who have begun to try to analyze Musk's behavior patterns and try to predict the price trend of Dogecoin. Therefore, every tweet of Musk has become the object of research by market analysts, and this phenomenon also reflects the uncertainty of the digital currency market and the fragile psychology of investors.

In this case, the role of market regulators is particularly important. With the popularity of Dogecoin and other digital currencies, how to effectively regulate these emerging assets has become a major challenge for regulators in various countries. Although some countries have begun to regulate digital currencies, there are still many gray areas that have not been covered. How to find a balance between protecting investors' rights and interests and encouraging innovation is a question that regulators need to think about seriously.

In short, Musk's role in the rise of Dogecoin has sparked widespread discussion. His Twitter speech has a great influence on the market, but whether there is any market manipulation still needs to be investigated in depth. With the continuous development of digital currencies, Musk's incident may be just the tip of the iceberg, and more similar cases will surface in the future. In this market full of opportunities and challenges, investors need to remain vigilant and analyze rationally in order to be invincible in the wave of digital currencies.

The four most famous international exchanges:

Binance INTL	OKX INTL	Gate.io INTL	Huobi INTL
China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL	China Line　APP DL

Note: The above exchange logo is the official website registration link, and the text is the APP download link.

According to Reuters, investors accused Musk in a complaint filed in Manhattan federal court on Wednesday night that he used Twitter posts, paid influencers, a 2021 talk show on NBC Saturday Night Live, and other publicity stunts to make profitable transactions through several Dogecoin wallets controlled by himself or Tesla. 

Investors alleged that in April this year, Musk sold about $124 million worth of Dogecoin to arbitrage after he changed the blue bird logo of social media Twitter to the Shiba Inu image of Dogecoin, causing the price of Dogecoin to surge 30%. 

A "dog smoking picture" posted by Musk in 2019 also became one of the evidences in the complaint. 

The complaint mentioned that Musk was able to promote himself and his company and defraud investors through "a carefully designed process of solicitation, market manipulation, insider trading, etc." Musk acquired Twitter in October last year. He also owns space technology company SpaceX, electric car giant Tesla, infrastructure company Boring Company and other companies.

Investors accuse Musk, who is currently ranked second on the Forbes Global Rich List, of deliberately spending two years to push the price of Dogecoin up by more than 36,000%, and then letting Dogecoin collapse.

The complaint is the third revision

To be precise, the lawsuit filed by Dogecoin investors against Musk was first filed in June last year, and the complaint was subsequently revised many times. Now Dogecoin investors have filed the third revision of the complaint, adding some new allegations.

In June last year, Dogecoin investor Keith Johnson filed a civil lawsuit against Musk and his company, accusing the defendants of knowing that Dogecoin lacked intrinsic value and using Ponzi-like methods to raise the price of Dogecoin and profit from it, and claiming up to $258 billion in "damages" from Musk. In September last year, the case was expanded to a class action lawsuit.

Musk and Tesla requested the dismissal of the second amended complaint in March this year, saying that the lawsuit was a fantasy fiction about Musk's "harmless tweets" about Dogecoin. Musk also said on May 26 that it was unreasonable to make another amendment to the complaint. However, Alvin Hellerstein, a judge at the U.S. Federal District Court in Manhattan, said on Wednesday that he was "very likely" to approve the third amended complaint, saying that the defendant was unlikely to be biased. He also approved the plaintiff's request to no longer list the Dogecoin Foundation as a defendant. Seth Levine, a lawyer for the Dogecoin Foundation, responded that this move was a "reasonable move."

In the future, we may see more cases of digital currency manipulation, and Musk's behavior may also become the focus of research by regulators. As an investor, it is crucial to understand market dynamics and sources of information. At the same time, as the market matures, investors' risk awareness and judgment will continue to improve. Through in-depth analysis and rational decision-making, perhaps we can find our own investment opportunities in this market full of variables.